>>143630
Mod who B& you here.
Yes, it was for metaposting. I'll grant I probably should've included a "R5" in that message to make it more clear what it was for and that's my fault so I apologize.

Please understand that when I'm online I mostly deal with spam/trolls, so my judgement is a little... impaired when it comes to dealing out punishment for normal rule breakings. In this case, a ban was excessive, especially seeing as you haven't made any prior offenses. I am sorry.

>is shared by many here
Citation needed.
Judging by past threads on the topic, either there is no consensus reached or it swings in the "meh, keep it around" camp. See: https://img.heyuri.net/q/koko.php?res=67673 and https://img.heyuri.net/q/koko.php?res=62934
Not to mention 143634-san. Personally, I can do with or without it. I don't feel strongly one way or the other.
But that's besides the point. I've went ahead and revoked your ban. You are a free man.

I better not be getting a salary cut for this shit...