Sorry for interrupting all the fun, but let me interject for a moment to explain how the humor is highly contextual for that one notable post.

In linguistics, anaphora is the use of an expression whose interpretation depends upon another expression in context (its antecedent).

Anaphora is an important concept for different reasons and on different levels: first, anaphora indicates how discourse is constructed and maintained; second, anaphora binds different syntactical elements together at the level of the sentence; third, anaphora presents a challenge to natural language processing in computational linguistics, since the identification of the reference can be difficult; and fourth, anaphora partially reveals how language is understood and processed, which is relevant to fields of linguistics interested in cognitive psychology.

Subsequently, binding is the phenomenon in which anaphoric elements such as pronouns are grammatically associated with their antecedents. Binding has been a major area of research in syntax and semantics since the 1970s and, as the name implies, is a core component of government and binding theory.

See fig.1 which demonstrates the segmentation.

I resolve the anaphoric element differently, and this is more powerful, because this way, it's not just a theoretical possibility, it reads: the smartest predator on the planet has always been out there and it looks like this: >>175881 >>/c/8779 >>/c/6898 >>/c/6886.

I don't reject your variant, though, because if they give an ultimate AGI/ASI the body of Sharxp-chan, either virtual or physical, it would be a massive win.