>>200376
I'm aware /l/'s very outdated tech, just the example closest at hand.
Now, I'm not intelligent enough to try and put what I mean by "visual illiteracy" or "the language of lines" into words. But if you try and copy anime frames or settei for a while you'll start seeing how fucking subtle and detailed the expressions even simple dialogue scenes are. AIGens can pass off as "human made" or even photorealistic but they don't have the complexity you see in the real deal once you understand how to "read" anime visually.
Beyond anime specifically, what's the purpose of art, anon? Beyond an immediate cute/ero/badass reaction, or it's use as an asset in a greater piece, art is about being able to "read" the mind of another person through it. Which necessarily yields an insane amount of complexity than can't be reproduced en masse on a fundamental level.

>the entire human concept of art will no longer exist by then, only perhaps acoustic live performance of music, and this at no guarantee of whether the artist themselves had not completely left the composition and writing to AI models, knowing only enough to be able to perform
That's so Chinese.