>>182280
Are you arguing for compatibilism?

>Rabbitfield can babble all he wants about how there is no truth and we can know nothing of the absolute, but he can only do this through the mediation of his fingers on his keyboard and through his and our screens, through the labor that went into creating all those things, and Heyuri, the electricity and acid and mushrooms and food he eats. That is truth. Truth is the movement of things through space and through time, the reckoning of objective and subjective. A Thing in itself is not truth. A Thing for another is not truth. A Thing, as a whole, in itself and for another, is where truth lies.

This is materialism.