all
a
/
b
/
c
/
f
/
h
/
j
/
jp
/
l
/
o
/
q
/
s
/
sw
/
lounge
cgi
up
wiki
Heyuri!
Bulletin Boards
2D Cute
2D Ero
2D Lolikon
3D Girls
Anime/Manga
Flash
Girl Talk
日本語/Japan
Lounge
Oekaki
Off-Topic
Site Discussion
Strange World
Overboard
Heyuri★CGI
Heyuri★CGI
@PartyII
Battle Royale R
Chat
Chinsouki★
Dating
DevChat
Drama Club
Hakoniwa Islands PvE
Hakoniwa Islands PvP
Polls
Slime Breeder
Web Banana
Web Shiritori
Yumemiru Gambler
Kakiko Checker
Other
Anime Nominations
Banners
Cytube
Heyuri Calendar
Heyuri Wiki
MAL Club
Museum
Steam Group
Uploader
[
Settings
]
[
Home
] [
Contact
] [
Catalog
] [
Search
] [
Thread list
] [
Stats
] [
Reports
] [
Watcher
] [
PMs
] [
Admin
]
Off-Topic@Heyuri
it's the place to be!
[
Return
]
Report a post
Preview
File:
sexy son hypothesis.png
(177 KB, 681x658)
ImgOps
Hide image
ImgOps
Hide image
▶
Anonymous
2024/10/05(Sat)20:39:57
No.
118705
[
Report
]
+
▶
>
PENIS
es" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://www.birdspot.co.uk/bird-reproduction/do-birds-have-
PENIS
es
>Another explanation put forward by two scientists in the 1970s is
the sexy son hypothesis
. This states that a female chooses a mate, not because of traits that would make him a good father or because he would produce healthier offspring of both sexes, but simply
because he will provide her with physically attractive sons
.
The sexy son hypothesis, uh... Does that mean that female birds are shotacons??
Post number
No.
118705
Board
Off-Topic@Heyuri
Reason
Optional. Describe what's wrong with it.
Style: