>>166822
I'll share too! Basically, I'm stuck between agnostic-theism, Gnosticism, and Perennialism. If we go off pure scientific reason and logic, agnosticism is the best bet, with the fine-tuning argument and human consciousness being a potential indicator of something bigger, thus theism, as this entity isn't active enough on Earth to prove itself by our means.
If we assume there is in fact a higher power we can sense, Gnosticism makes the most logical sense, as it solves the problem of evil and still gives a form of salvation for the afterlife.
Perennialism doesn't explain the philosophical arguments against religious thought (unless linked with Gnosticism in the sense that all Gods are real, lower eminatins of the monad, kinda liek the 365 heavens of the Basilideans) but would explain not just others finding religions they weren't born in, but also my own experiences with neo-pagan experimentation (mostly Kemetism.)