>>165511
>It's probably not gonna stop at that though.
I've noticed that with "moralfaggots", they will never ever be satisfied in their "righteous"crusade. If you give them the opportunity to ban websites for children, soon they'll change the definition of "children" to anyone below the age of 21, then anyone below the age of 50. Once they get their way, it becomes very difficult to undo/revert any laws.

If nothing else, "children on SNS" serves as a buffer/distraction against them doing even more stupid things.